Суд апелляционной инстанции приходит к выводу о том, что действия научно-производственной фирмы обосновано квалифицированы антимонопольным органом как нарушения пунктов 1, 2 части 1 статьи статьи 14 Федерального закона от 26.07.2006 № 135-ФЗ, а основания для признания решения № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 и предписания № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 незаконными в рассматриваемом случае отсутствуют.
stdClass Object
(
[vid] => 7040
[uid] => 5
[title] => Постановление Восьмого арбитражного апелляционного суда по делу № А81-3441/2012
[log] =>
[status] => 1
[comment] => 1
[promote] => 0
[sticky] => 0
[nid] => 7040
[type] => solution
[language] => ru
[created] => 1375179380
[changed] => 1375179380
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[revision_timestamp] => 1375179380
[revision_uid] => 5
[body] => Array
(
[ru] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[value] =>
Суд апелляционной инстанции приходит к выводу о том, что действия научно-производственной фирмы обосновано квалифицированы антимонопольным органом как нарушения пунктов 1, 2 части 1 статьи статьи 14 Федерального закона от 26.07.2006 № 135-ФЗ, а основания для признания решения № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 и предписания № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 незаконными в рассматриваемом случае отсутствуют.
[summary] =>
[format] => full_html
[safe_value] =>
Суд апелляционной инстанции приходит к выводу о том, что действия научно-производственной фирмы обосновано квалифицированы антимонопольным органом как нарушения пунктов 1, 2 части 1 статьи статьи 14 Федерального закона от 26.07.2006 № 135-ФЗ, а основания для признания решения № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 и предписания № 02-01/14/05-2012 от 14.06.2012 незаконными в рассматриваемом случае отсутствуют.
[safe_summary] =>
)
)
)
[field_solution_num] => Array
(
)
[field_solution_file_num] => Array
(
[ru] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[value] => № А81-3441/2012
[format] =>
[safe_value] => № А81-3441/2012
)
)
)
[field_solution_preview] => Array
(
)
[field_solution_cat] => Array
(
[ru] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[tid] => 13
[taxonomy_term] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 13
[vid] => 3
[name] => Судебные решения
[description] =>
[format] => full_html
[weight] => 2
[vocabulary_machine_name] => category_solutions
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
[rdftype] => Array
(
[0] => skos:Concept
)
[name] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => rdfs:label
[1] => skos:prefLabel
)
)
[description] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:definition
)
)
[vid] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:inScheme
)
[type] => rel
)
[parent] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:broader
)
[type] => rel
)
)
)
)
)
)
[field_solution_file] => Array
(
[ru] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[fid] => 937
[uid] => 5
[filename] => a81-3441-2012_20130716_postanovlenie_apelljacii.pdf
[uri] => public://solution/2013/07/30/a81-3441-2012_20130716_postanovlenie_apelljacii.pdf
[filemime] => application/pdf
[filesize] => 262378
[status] => 1
[timestamp] => 1375179380
[origname] => a81-3441-2012_20130716_postanovlenie_apelljacii.pdf
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
)
[display] => 1
[description] => Постановление Восьмого арбитражного апелляционного суда по делу № А81-3441/2012
)
)
)
[field_solution_scope] => Array
(
[ru] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[tid] => 3
[taxonomy_term] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 3
[vid] => 6
[name] => Антимонопольное регулирование
[description] =>
[format] => full_html
[weight] => 6
[vocabulary_machine_name] => practice_areas
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
[rdftype] => Array
(
[0] => skos:Concept
)
[name] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => rdfs:label
[1] => skos:prefLabel
)
)
[description] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:definition
)
)
[vid] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:inScheme
)
[type] => rel
)
[parent] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:broader
)
[type] => rel
)
)
)
)
)
)
[field_solution_tags] => Array
(
[und] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[tid] => 83
[taxonomy_term] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 83
[vid] => 1
[name] => Ямало-Ненецкое УФАС России
[description] =>
[format] =>
[weight] => 0
[vocabulary_machine_name] => tags
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
[rdftype] => Array
(
[0] => skos:Concept
)
[name] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => rdfs:label
[1] => skos:prefLabel
)
)
[description] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:definition
)
)
[vid] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:inScheme
)
[type] => rel
)
[parent] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => skos:broader
)
[type] => rel
)
)
)
)
)
)
[field_solution_datetime_public] => Array
(
[und] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[value] => 2013-07-30 10:09:00
[timezone] => Asia/Yekaterinburg
[timezone_db] => UTC
[date_type] => datetime
)
)
)
[field_nodes_related] => Array
(
)
[field_date] => Array
(
[und] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[value] => 2013-07-16 10:09:00
[timezone] => Asia/Yekaterinburg
[timezone_db] => UTC
[date_type] => datetime
)
)
)
[field_simplenews_term] => Array
(
)
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
[rdftype] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:Item
[1] => foaf:Document
)
[title] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:title
)
)
[created] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:date
[1] => dc:created
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
[changed] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:modified
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
[body] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => content:encoded
)
)
[uid] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:has_creator
)
[type] => rel
)
[name] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => foaf:name
)
)
[comment_count] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:num_replies
)
[datatype] => xsd:integer
)
[last_activity] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:last_activity_date
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
)
[cid] => 0
[last_comment_timestamp] => 1375179380
[last_comment_name] =>
[last_comment_uid] => 5
[comment_count] => 0
[name] => moder
[picture] => 0
[data] => a:2:{s:7:"contact";i:0;s:7:"overlay";i:1;}
[subscriptions_notify] =>
[entity_view_prepared] => 1
[region_name] => Ямало-Ненецкое УФАС России
)